Work on the landfill that would eventually lead to Grant Park (Chicago Daily News Photo Archive) |
Interesting article
on this date, June 26, back in 1894 as the Chicago
Tribune reported on the Chicago City Council meeting of the previous evening,
at which the principal topic for consideration was a resolution regarding the
Lake-Front park, that area of the city which is today Grant Park.
Two years earlier
the city had begun the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, the immense
earth-moving undertaking that would, it was hoped, reverse the flow of the
Chicago River, relieve the city of its foulness, and save the city’s supply of
fresh water from Lake Michigan into which the river had always flowed.
The 28-mile
excavation was, among other things, creating a lot of dirt, and the Drainage
Board had offered the city 3,000,000 cubic yards of fill, free of charge, fill
that could be dumped into the lake east of the Illinois Central Railroad tracks
on the lakefront, instantly creating a new expanse of land that could become
park space.
Alderman Madden
urged a quick acceptance of the offer.
According to The Tribune,
Alderman Madden stated, “This offer ought to be accepted and the earth utilized
at the present time. The project was
feasible. The park was a necessity for
the people of the overcrowded districts of the city. The project had been approved by the
intelligence of the city. It was
demanded by the masses. The matter ought
to be acted upon at once.” [Chicago Tribune, June 26, 1894]
Alderman Ballard
immediately opposed the plan saying that the lakefront was a nuisance and would
continue to be a nuisance, adding that the only time he had ever been offered a
bribe had been in connection with the lakefront. Alderman “Bathhouse” John Coughlin also
opposed the development plan, saying that it would necessitate viaducts to
access the new property and that viaducts were “objectionable.”
Alderman Gallagher
then rose to speak, asserting that the aldermen whose wards lay close to the
lake had opposed every plan for improvement which did not “increase the value
of their property or put money in their pockets.” Chicago would still be a lake village if
everyone shared their “unprogressive” views was the thrust of his argument.
A motion to table
the resolution was voted down, 40 to 25, and soon after the lakefront
resolution was passed.
It
read:
WHEREAS, It has long been the desire of the
citizens of Chicago to know what use is to be made of the Lake-Front, from
Randolph street to Park row; and,
WHEREAS, It appears from the late decision
of the United States Supreme Court that the unquestioned title is in the City
of Chicago; and,
WHEREAS, It is desirable that it be put to
some use; and,
WHEREAS, The Drainage Trustees have let the
contracts for the eastern portions of the Drainage Canal, the terms of which
provide for the removal of the earth excavated from the line of said canal;
and,
WHEREAS, Such contractors are now towing all
the material to a point in Lake Michigan, where a depth of 50 feet of water can
be found; and,
WHEREAS, It is desirable that the space east
of the Illinois Central right of way to a point 750 feet west of the government
breakwater be utilized for a people’s park; and,
WHEREAS, There is no doubt that the Drainage
Canal contractors would be glad to dump the excavated from the canal in this
space without cost to the city; therefore, be it
ORDERED,
That the Mayor and Commissioner of Public Works be, and they are herby,
requested to enter into negotiations, the result to be reported to the Council:
First—With the Illinois Central railroad
company for the lowering of its tracks from the present grade so that the present
Lake-Front Park can be carried over them.
Second—With the proper government officials
with a view of securing permission to extend the park 1,250 east of the
Illinois Central railway; and,
Third—with the Drainage Canal contractors
with a view to having them fill the space indicated without cost to the City of
Chicago.
Note the below grade railroad tracks running straight up the middle of the photo (JWB Photo) |
At
that meeting on that night one hundred twenty years ago Chicago began to lift
itself out of the smoke and stench and become the city it is today. When you stand on the Nichols Bridgeway
leading from Millennium Park to the Modern Wing of the Art Institute of Chicago
and survey those railroad tracks running below grade . . . they are where they
are because of that resolution.
And
when you enter Grant Park from Columbus Drive and draw close to a Buckingham
Fountain, the setting in which that gem is placed would not have existed
without the action taken on that night so long ago.
Buckingham Fountain in Grant Park (JWB Photo) |
All
in all, not a bad couple of hours of work for the pols on that early summer
evening back in 1894.