Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Chicago Building Height -- Up or Down? (January 21, 1902)

The Railway Exchange Building of 1904 (left) & The People's Gas Building (1910)
One hundred-twelve years ago on this day, January 21, the Judiciary Committee of the Chicago City Council made a recommendation to that body that all restrictions on the height of “full fire-proof construction” buildings be lifted. [Chicago Tribune, January 22, 1902]

There was a considerable amount of pressure placed upon aldermen to remove the height restrictions, and The Tribune observed, “Representatives of building firms asserted that in Chicago alone of all great cities in America were such limitations in effect and they declared that the competition with other cities would force the removal of restrictions here.”

Mayor Carter Harrison went on record as favoring the removal of restrictions on building height even though he was in favor of restriction four years earlier when a 130-foot height limit was imposed.  “The unfortunate thing in this city is the fact that Chicago is a sort of wheel, the loop district being the hub, with the spokes radiating into the outlying wards,” he said.  “With rentals being where they are and space so valuable in the district bounded by the loop, it is impossible to get enough out of property to make it a good investment unless the buildings are allowed to go up.”

There were a number of arguments put forth as to why the height limit should be kept in place.  Some felt that tall buildings were ugly, belching smoke and blocking the sky.  Others felt that tall buildings made for an unhealthy city, cutting off light and air from anyone at ground level.  Still others argued that with tall buildings holding as many people as a good-sized town, the congestion they caused was insufferable.  And, of course, the owners and developers of tall buildings erected before the 1898 set of restrictions were not especially joyful at the prospect of taller and more modern structures competing for leases.

Members of the city council were inclined to agree.

Chicago Building of 1905 (JWB Photo)
Sensing that council members were opposed to raising the height limit, the First National Bank applied the pressure, announcing that it was abandoning its proposed building projects, threatening to remove nearly $12,000,000 from the construction calendar and the tax rolls.

D. R. Forgan, the president of First National said, “Why the owners of the Masonic temple property should be permitted to erect a building of over twenty stories and many others of sixteen and seventeen and the same privilege denied to the First National Bank, which is at the center of the loop, I fail to understand.”

Owen Aldis, the agent behind such great buildings as the Marquette, the Rookery, and the Monadnock, said, “The attitude of the Council is short sighted and narrow in the extreme.  It may please the present owners of high buildings, but it is certain to check contemplated large improvements.  It is stated that building to cost $12,000,000 are involved.  The figures really are much larger, as I know of several other large plans which will be abandoned if the Council stands on Monday night’s action.”

In the end a majority of City Council members voted to end the restrictions – sort of.  The last section of the ordinance read, “No buildings shall be erected in the City of Chicago of greater height than 130 feet from the sidewalk level to the highest point of external bearing walls.  No restriction contained in this ordinance regarding the height of buildings shall apply to any building to be hereafter erected which shall be erected in full fire proof construction.”


A Tribune editorial on February 6, 1902 provided the final word on the subject – at least until 1920 when the height restrictions were once again changed.  “Without any reference to individual cases,” the piece read, “The Tribune is decidedly of the opinion that the high buildings—meaning thereby structures of more than ten stories – are a public advantage.  Arguments are advanced against them, but those arguments did not convince the Council, nor do they have influence with the general public.”

University Club of 1909 (JWB Photo)

Saturday, January 18, 2014

A Bridge Not Far Enough (La Salle Street, Chicago) -- January 18, 1925

The Fire Tug Graeme Stewart, launched in Manitowoc, Wisconsin in 1918
(Maritime History of the Great Lakes)
Here’s one for the “Think You’ve Got It Bad – Things Could Always Be Worse” department.  It happened on this date, January 18, in 1925.

George D. Buckley started down the incline leading to the La Salle Street bridge when he realized that there was no bridge across the river at La Salle Street.  By the time he made the connection (about the fact that there was no connection) it was too late and car, driver, and companion slid to the edge of the river where they dropped ten feet onto the deck of the fire tug Graeme Stewart. [Chicago Tribune, January 19, 1925]

I would imagine that the crewmembers of the Graeme Stuart were surprised at the landing. 


If Mr. Buckley had just waited a few years . . . a bridge across the river at La Salle was dedicated on December 12, 1928.  That was the first bridge at that location although a tunnel under the river at La Salle Street had begun operation around 1871.

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Chicago's Bridges -- January 15, 1955

Going Up -- But Not Nearly As Often (JWB Photo)
A few days ago I wrote about the abysmal state of the bridges in Chicago as the 1900’s began.  By the middle of that century, they were almost working too well.  On this date in 1955, January 15, the city’s Public Works Commissioner, George L. DeMent, gave a report on the utilization of the city’s 55 moveable bridges during the preceding year.

The figures today are staggering, especially since these days few Chicagoans or visitors suffer significant inconvenience because of the raising of bridges over the river.  Mr. DeMent reported that bridges delayed vehicles and pedestrians for a total of 166 days (when all of the minutes that the bridges were lifted was added together) and were raised 53,615 times to allow river traffic to pass beneath them.  Even more amazing, these figures were down significantly from 1953 when the bridges accounted for 174 days of delay when 54 bridges were raised 61,181 times. [Chicago Tribune, January 16, 1955]

The winner in the bridge-raising marathon was the Ninety-Fifth Street bridge over the Calumet River, which was raised 7,670 times, accounting for 28,605 minutes, averaging 3.508 minutes each time it was raised.

The losers?  The bridge spanning Ogden slip, raised only 17 times during the whole year and the Belmont Avenue bridge over the north branch, which was raised just 83 times.

Think for a moment about Michigan Avenue and the DuSable Bridge that today carries the busy street over the river.  If you’re there at the wrong time on Wednesdays or Saturdays in spring and fall, you may be faced with a short delay as a few sailboats ripple underneath.  In 1954 that bridge was raised 732 times with an average delay of 6.147 minutes.  The La Salle Street Bridge followed just behind with 713 lifts.  Then Wells Street with 705.  The Washington Street Bridge was raised 611 times, the Madison Street Bridge 569 times, and the Lake Street Bridge 491 times.

You feel kind of sorry for folks back then, a half-century ago stalled in traffic that idled before a raised span . . . with the advent of texting still a half-century in the future.



Tuesday, January 14, 2014

The Real Thing -- January 14, 1954

The Pause that Refreshes (chuckmanchicagonostalgia.wordpress.com)
It was 60 years ago, January 14, 1954 when Judge George B. Weiss in Women’s Court sentenced Mrs. Rosie Patterson of 2206 Lake Street to the Bridewell for ten days, followed by a one-year probation. 

It seems that on the preceding December 17 Mrs. Patterson’s little daughter, Alice, a student in the first grade classroom of Mrs. Sybil L. Dungee at the Hayes School, had come home wearing a smock instead of the snowsuit in which Mrs. Patterson had sent her off to school.

Mrs. Dungee, the teacher, had removed the wet snowsuit and given little Alice the smock to wear, but somehow the child had left the school and gone home.  This so incensed Mrs. Patterson that she returned to the school on that December afternoon and whacked Mrs. Dungee with a soft drink bottle.  [Chicago Tribune, January 15, 1954]


It is unclear from reportage whether Mrs. Dungee was able to hang onto the bottle and return it for a deposit refund.  She probably could have used the nickel. The highest salary on the pay scale was $5,890, and at 30 she was a long way off from seeing that.

Monday, January 13, 2014

Grant Park Parking Garage Contract Let -- January 13, 1953

A parking garage beneath Grant Park today seems like a no-brainer today.  Imagine
if this 1934 scene were still a part of Chicago's front yard!  (Google Image)
On this date way back in 1953 Chicago began to acknowledge that the automobile was here to stay when the park board awarded a contract to John Griffith and Son Construction Company for construction of the city’s first underground parking garage.  Built beneath Grant Park with entrances and exits from Michigan Avenue, it would have space for 2,350 autos.  The contract price, which included stripping of topsoil from the park, excavation beneath the park, Michigan and Randolph Streets was $6,539,539.  Someone must have liked odd numbers.  Initial estimates for the completion of the project provided a figure of 675 days.  Things moved along quickly, and the new garage opened with a ribbon-cutting ceremony attended by a 50-piece band on September 1, 1954.