Thursday, July 9, 2020

July 9,1905 -- Chicago Imports Nearly 100,000 Railroad Cars of Sand and Dirt Each Year

bing.com
July 9, 1905 – The Chicago Daily Tribune runs an article on the amount of sand, dirt and gravel that Chicago imports each year, estimating that the cost for the commodities is over a million dollars (about $29 million in today's dollars).  In the preceding year 10,000 railroad cars of “fine building sand” were hauled into the city from the Indiana dunes.  Twice that number came from Illinois and Wisconsin, carrying “torpedo sand” (sand used in concrete mixes) and gravel.  Another 50,000 cars of common dirt and black soil were brought into the city.  Interestingly, at this time anyone building a home in the area from the lake to Halsted Street could probably find enough usable sand for concrete and mortar just by excavating the basement.  The dunes of Indiana along the southern edge of Lake Michigan supplied the rest.  Sand companies laid railroad tracks into the dunes and used steam shovels to “eat away at the hills” that were made up of “the finest building sand to be found in the world”.  The industry only operated during the building season with sand moved directly from the dunes to the building site where it was needed.  One would expect to pay $1.00 to $1.25 a cubic yard for sand delivered by horse and wagon to the building.  Forty percent of that price was for the cost of the delivery with a typical load of two to three yards averaging 3,000 pounds a cubic yard.  The best grade of torpedo sand came from the hills of Illinois and Wisconsin over fifty miles away.  A company typically would buy a sand hill from its owner and set up a refining plant next to it, separating the raw material into five grades, two of gravel, two of coarse stone and one of crushed stone.  The Tribune observes that “When the sand company gets through with a hill ‘there ain’t no hill there ‘tall.’  Sometimes in its place there is a big, shallow hole in the ground.  The operation of mining a hill for sand runs several years “and the company always gets back the money put into the plant, with good, substantial interest.”  As soon as the temperature falls below freezing, operations cease, a schedule that aligns with the building and construction industries, meaning that a businessman engaged in the business has little need for a storage yard as “He takes it from the hill, delivers it where it is contracted for, and turns it into cash in short order.”  Sand mining is still a big business in Wisconsin, especially, but these days the sand is used to fracture rock in the process of drilling for oil and natural gas.  One such Wisconsin operation is shown above.

arctic.edu
July 9, 1981 – The Chicago Tribune reports that the Art Institute of Chicago has acquired Geroges Braque’s “Landscape at La Ciotat.”  The painting was purchased from the collection of Mr. and Mrs. Leigh B. Block at an auction that took place on May 22 at Sotheby Parke Bernet in New York. Art Institute curator A. James Speyer says of the work, “We have always wished to acquire a fine work of this period by Georges Braque, and the new painting embodies the very essence of Fauvism at its most brilliant.  [Chicago Tribune, July 9, 1981]. La Ciotat is a small Mediterranean resort just east of Marseilles.. Braque’s work at La Ciotat in 1906 and 1907 occurred during a time when he shared bright, bold colors with a loosely affiliated group of artists who adopted the name “Fauves” – “wild beasts” – taken from a review of an unkindly critic.  It appears that the painting that the Art Institute acquired is actually “Landscape at L’Estaque,” the painting that is currently on display in Gallery 391.  The date of its acquisition, the gallery at which it was sold, as well as the date of the sale and the Block collection from which it came all seem to match up.  That painting is pictured above.  “Landscape at La Ciotat” hangs in New York’s Museum of Modern Art.



July 9, 1974 – For the first time a woman sits behind the wheel of a Chicago Transit Authority bus as Ms. Mary Wallace pilots the State Street bus on the 36A route, starting at the C.T.A. garage at Seventy-Seventh and Vincennes Avenue.  Ms. Wallace says that the training took her 15 days during which time she says “it rained a lot.”  She added further that she applied for the job and was “in it for the money.”  [Chicago Tribune, July 10, 1974] Ms. Wallace is pictured in the photo above with former Illinois Governor Pat Quinn.



July 9, 1934 – Eleanor Roosevelt has a full schedule of events as she visits Chicago for two days. At 9:30 a.m. the wife of President Franklin Roosevelt holds a press conference in the NBC studios at the Merchandise Mart.  At 10:15 a.m. she visits the Simmons exhibit at the Century of Progress and participates in a commercial broadcast for the company, the proceeds of which will be donated to charity.  At noon the First Lady takes lunch with the president of the fair and his wife, Mr. and Mrs. Rufus C. Dawes, after which she requests to see the fair without an escort.  At 5:30 Mrs. Roosevelt is the guest at a reception given by the Women’s Trade Union League at 530 South Ashland Avenue.  Unbelievably, she arrives in Chicago on the night of July 8 from Madison, Indiana with no official escort.  She and two female companions make the 265-mile drive, taking turns at the wheel of a “low slung, sand colored automobile,” their arrival at the Blackstone Hotel “heralded by no fanfare, their path was cleared by no police escort and no committee of notables was waiting to greet them.”  [Chicago Daily Tribune, July 9, 1934]



July 9, 1880 –The Chicago Daily Tribune reports on a conference in Lockport between the Canal Commissioners, Mayor Carter Harrison of Chicago, and a delegation of citizens from the city and towns along the Illinois and Michigan Canal. The particular issue is the establishment of the Bridgeport Pumping Works, for which the Chicago City Council has appropriated $100,000. The Mayor maintains that the Canal Commissioners must guarantee that the works will carry off a specific amount of water while the Commissioners are unwilling to make such a guarantee. Mayor Harrison and his delegation make the trip to Lockport “over the not placid bosom of the raging canal.” [Chicago Daily Tribune, July 9, 1880] The trip begins at the Adams Street bridge and although “in some places the water was black and turbid, in others of a clayey hue,” the delegation from Chicago finds the trip rather pleasant.  It is a different story in Lockport, though, as neither the mayor or the commissioners want to enter into an agreement that will put them in a corner.  Harrison wants the commissioners to say to the city, “From the necessity of the circumstances we are creating a nuisance along the line of the canal.  You are secondarily responsible because you make that water foul. You are the wolf that fouls the water, and these people down here on the canal are the lambs … We haven’t the means to purify it, but we propose that if you do that we will do our share, and say what that share is.”  A member of the Sanitary Commission states its position … that the commission was a creature of the State of Illinois and was charged with overseeing the function of the canal and could not go outside of the powers delegated to it by determining sanitary conditions.  Considerable give-and-take follows with the mayor maintaining that although the city contributes to the offensiveness of the canal, it is the Sanitary Commission’s responsibility to do something about it, the Commission arguing that it has no legal authority to do that.  At one point Mayor Harrison says to a commissioner, “You and I are giving a stench to the people on this river,” to which the commissioner replies, “I deny that. You are.” The meeting breaks up with little headway made.  The participants agree to communicate about the proposed pumping works at Bridgeport with Mayor Harrison saying, “I don’t want to buy a pig in a poke or put Chicago’s neck in a noose.”  The Commissioners agree “to support him in every undertaking to relieve the city where it had the authority of law to do so.” The above photo shows the lock that originally separated the Chicago River from the Illinois and Michigan canal.

No comments: